Sunday, February 18, 2018

MONTREAL POLICE WILL NOT INVESTIGATE EVEN WHEN THERE IS A CORPSE.


HOW DID ED MCSWEENEY DIE?  HOW DID MY MOTHER DIE?


HOW DID KENNETH GREGOIRE PRUD'HOMME, A COMPLETE STRANGER WHO NEVER MET MY FATHER, COME TO INHERIT MY FATHER'S LIFE'S SAVINGS AND OUR FAMILY HOME?

WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO MY SISTER, DEBBIE RUBIN MCSWEENEY?


MONTREAL POLICE ALWAYS REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE.



THE EVIDENCE
 
The laws of Canada protect criminals: No one in Canada protects crime victims. I know this because I am a Canadian crime victim. A Montreal Police officer helped the criminal, Dawn McSweeney, rob and destroy my family.
 
I have been fighting for the return of our precious valuables, day and night, since the day I was attacked and robbed, with the help of a Montreal police officer - October 7 1996.

Here is 

EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT 

 
"Mrs. Carter's Rights were Violated Three Times."

Marlene Jennings, Member of Parliament, Canada.

 
My name is Phyllis Carter. I am an 81 year old Canadian journalist, a widow and cancer patient and - thanks to the Montreal Police - I am also a crime victim. I have been fighting for justice since October 7, 1996, when I was attacked in my home and robbed of everything I had worked for all my life and everything left to me by my beloved husband. 


While I was holding off my attacker, I managed to call 911. 


The Montreal Police I called to rescue me - helped the thief instead.

I told the police immediately who had robbed me but, through all the years and through all my appeals,  I have not been able to get the Montreal Police to take any action to recover my stolen belongings from Dawn McSweeney, the person who robbed me and my family, or to take any legal action against her and her accomplices.      


At the Meet the Candidates assembly in NDG on October 7, 2008, former Liberal Member of Parliament, and Quebec Deputy Police Ethics Commissioner, Marlene Jennings, stated before all the candidates and the public -


"Mrs. Carter's Rights Were Violated Three Times".


1. In 1996, the Montreal Police refused to file a report of the initial robbery. They have continued to refuse to act ever since.

2. In 2007, immediately following the death of my mother, the same group of criminals obtained a court order accusing me of being insane and dangerous. I was released from hospital unconditionally as soon as the doctors found out what my accusers had done and why.

After my mother's death, we learned that -

3. In 2005, the same group who call themselves "Partners in Crime" created a will in my mother's name when she was 92 years old and handicapped physically and mentally. My mother had been kept in total isolation by these criminals for a decade - until her death.
 
The sole beneficiaries of the 2005 will were the same people who robbed me and obtained the court order against me. Then it became clear why these criminals tried to discredit me and silence me.

Marlene Jennings later repeated her statement at a Sunday service in Rosedale United Church in Montreal. 

But, to this day, the Montreal Police refuse to take any action against Dawn McSweeney and those she calls her "partners in crime" on her own blog.

I believe there can be only one logical explanation for why the Montreal Police refuse to act against the criminals in this case: One of their own officers helped Dawn McSweeney to rob me - and his partner, who my attacker called "Mario" in a very familiar way - did nothing to help me. 


$5,000. REWARD
 
MEET DAWN MCSWEENEY
I SAVED HER LIFE - SHE STOLE MINE
 
HOW TO RAISE A CRIMINAL
THE TRAGEDY OF DAWN MCSWEENEY
 
Circa February, 1994, I moved back to my parents' home at 4995 Prince of Wales, NDG, Montreal. I was sick with cancer, widowed, unemployed and my mother wanted me home.
 
Summer 1996 - Good friends paid a brief visit. As soon as they left, Dawn McSweeney, my youngest sister's daughter, told my mother - in my presence - that my friends only pretended to love me, but they really despised me. In spite of Dawn McSweeney's jealousy and hatred, they are still my friends to this day.

 
THE THIEF, DAWN MCSWEENEY, WAS ALWAYS AFTER MONEY
 
The beginning of October, 1996, Dawn and her boyfriend, Alex Lavergne, suddenly moved into 4995.
 
October 5, 1996 - I did a new inventory of all my belongings at 4995, expecting Dawn to pilfer. I pleaded with my mother to keep Dawn out of my rooms - to no avail.
 
October 7, 1996 - I was suddenly attacked in the foyer of our home. I managed to call 911.  The Montreal Police I hoped would come to my rescue, helped the thief instead.
 
The officer took me out of the house by my arm and told me I had to leave my home and never return for any reason.
 
I was not allowed to take anything with me except my bible, my purse, and a pair of shoes that I liked to wear in church,.
 
The police left me in the street in front of my home without as much as a coat - and they just drove away. There was no legal process, and I learned later that they did not make a police report.
 
THE RAPE OF A JEWISH FAMILY
 
THE DANGERS OF BEING CHRISTIAN
 
 
ABANDONED BY PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE -
PRUDENTIAL BLAMED THE MONTREAL POLICE  -
http://phylliscartersjournal.blogspot.com/2013/01/abandoned-by-prudential-insurance.html.

I paid premiums to Prudential Insurance for thirty years. On October 8 or 9, 1996 - I reported the robbery to my Prudential Insurance agent, Brian Thornily. Prudential insurance abandoned me. As soon as they heard that a police officer helped the thief, they refused to investigate. Later, Prudential's agent told me it was because the police had made their report of the robbery "too late".
 

I had pleaded with the police to investigate from the moment I called 911, and constantly thereafter, but they refused, saying everything would be returned to me if I would "just be patient". It has been a lifetime of years since this horrible crime tore my life apart, and the Montreal Police still refuse to take appropriate action.
 
1996-97 - I got a tip that Dawn McSweeney had a friend who operated a jewellery store on Prince Arthur. I told Montreal Police detective, Sylvie Laverdiere. She told me that, since I was a Pinkerton investigator, I should do the investigation myself and report back to her. I did that, verbally and in a detailed written report.
 
The police at the Mariette station told me to go back home and ask my mother to return my jewelery. I went to the house and stood on the icy steps pleading with my mother to give me back my belongings. Dawn McSweeney came to the door and laughed at me as I stood on the steps weeping - and she mocked me. Then she went inside and called the police.
 
AS I CRIED AND PLEADED FOR MY BELONGINGS, DAWN MCSWEENEY LAUGHED AND MOCKED ME
 
The same officers who had told me to go home and ask for my belongings came to the house and told me to leave. I refused to leave without my precious belongings. The woman officer said she would have to arrest me if I didn't leave. I begged her to arrest me so the case could go to court. She promised the police would recover my belongings, so I agreed to leave.
 
Montreal Police detective Sylvie Laverdiere went to 4995 Prince of Wales and asked for my belongings. Detective Laverdiere told me she did not enter the house, but Dawn McSweeney handed her my Borg winter coat - and nothing else - none of my valuables.
 
March 17, 1997 - Dawn McSweeney returned what she did not want - my clothing, some files, and all my jewellery boxes and cases -  EMPTY.
 
THE RETURN OF THE EMPTY JEWEL BOXES
 
March 17, 1997 - I brought the suitcase full of empty little jewellery boxes to the police at the Mariette station. Then they finally said they would investigate - six months after the attack and robbery.
 
Two police detectives, a man and a woman, came to my apartment all decked out with guns and radios and all sorts of gear. It looked as if - at long last - they would do a serious investigation.
 
The detectives told me they had to take some boxes and the suitcase that had contained  my jewellery to the police lab to test for fingerprints. Dawn McSweeney, Debbie McSweeney and Ed McSweeney, Dawn's father, had all handled my belongings. One of them had even initialed boxes to show they had searched the contents. But, once the police detectives took the boxes and suitcase, the incriminating evidence "disappeared". The detectives told me there were "no fingerprints". They did not say the prints were smeared or unclear. They insisted that "There were NO fingerprints" - Not even mine? "No, none."
 
Passing by 4995 Prince of Wales in my car in April, 2004, I noticed that the front stoop was littered with junk mail. I dared to go to the door and rang the bell. No answer. Maybe my mother just didn't want to speak to me.
 
OUR AGED MOTHER WAS MISSING -
MONTREAL POLICE REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE. 
 
I went around to the back of the house to try to see through the window if my mother was alright. There were strange holes all around the back yard and the back door and window were covered with dead brown vines. It was like an Alfred Hitchcock movie. I feared the worst. I called for an ambulance. Police came and there was no response. I asked the police at the Somerled station to investigate. They refused.
 
Mother "disappeared" and no one knew where she was - or how she was. But the Montreal Police refused to investigate. Our mother was kept in total isolation for about ten years by Dawn McSweeney and those she calls her "partners in crime" on her own blog.
 
Summer, 2007 - I was told by my brother that Paperman and Sons, funeral directors, had informed him that our mother was dead. I went to the cemetery. There I saw a stranger with my sister, Debbie. The Paperman agent told me that Debbie called the man her "husband". What happened to Ed McSweeney?*

Paperman's agent told me that the stranger's name was Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme. Three Montreal Police cars attended the burial. I thanked one of the officers for being there. The whole thing was bizarre. 

A day after the burial of my mother, two police officers knocked on my door. They had a court order declaring that I was insane and dangerous and they took me to the hospital for a "thirty day mental evaluation."
 
THE PHYLLIS CARTER DETENTION
CONDEMNED IN ABSENTIA IN FOUR MINUTES
 
I returned home three days later, Afterward, I learned that Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme had requested the court order which was granted in four minutes without anyone in authority notifying me, seeing me, speaking to me, without any evidence or medical report or any witnesses - except for the stranger who had never met me or spoken to me - Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme - and Dawn McSweeney's mother, my beloved "baby sister", Debbie.
 
Later, I learned that, two years prior to her death, in 2005, when my mother was about 92 years old, Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme had made a will in my mother's name, eliminating all the children and grandchildren specifically named in my father's will - and giving our family home and my father's life's savings to Debbie McSweeney and Dawn McSweeney, and making himself the "liquidator" of my father's estate - a man who never even met my father who had died in 2000.
 
MOTHER DID NOT SIGN THAT WILL
SHE WAS 92 YEARS OLD AND ILL
 
Dawn McSweeney had six months of total, uninterrupted access to all my precious belongings, and she stole the best of everything I had worked for all my life and all the gifts I had receive all my life - every precious souvenir of my lifetime. No amount of money could ever replace what Dawn McSweeney stole with the help of the Montreal Police.
 
In 2008, Member of Parliament and former Quebec Police Ethics Commissioner, Marlene Jennings, stated at two public meetings in Montreal - "Mrs. Carter's rights were violated three times."   
 
MRS. CARTER'S RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED THREE TIMES -
MARLENE JENNINGS, M.P.

But the Montreal Police refuse still refuse to recover our stolen property or to arrest the thief and those she calls her "partners in crime,"
 
Why? 

Because a Montreal Police officer was involved in the crime from the moment he answered my 911 call. And because the Montreal Police refused to take action against the thief, she and her accomplices went on to rob my parents, my siblings and my siblings' children of their inheritances.
  
Marlene Jennings, Liberal Member of Canada's Parliament, stated at two public meetings in 2008 - "MRS. CARTER'S RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED THREE TIMES.'
 
Russell Copeman, Member of Quebec's Legislature, acknowledged that my rights were violated and he tried to get the Conseil de la Magistrature to take action against the judge who condemned me in absentia, based solely on the most bizarre accusations made against me by a complete stranger - Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme - a person I had never met or spoken to. A man I knew nothing about. I saw him in the distance once - at my mother's burial in June, 2007.  

In the application to have me declared insane and dangerous - an act that resulted in the court order - Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme, a man I never met - declares that -
 
Phyllis Carter -
Dances naked on her mother's grave while wearing a bullet proof vest,   
Wears a large cross,   
Quotes the Bible,   
Kills cats by throwing them against a wall,   
Sets fires for pleasure, and   
Dreams of killing her parents in their bed.
 
(Note: These criminals even know what I dream about.)
 
See the two reports in The Suburban Weekly newspaper - September, 2007 -
The Phyllis Carter Detention - and - Condemned in Absentia in Four Minutes.
 
I am fighting for my life and for justice. 

Quebec's Human Rights Commission says I am "too late" for justice.
 
It is not only young members of minority communities that suffer abuse at the hands of the Montreal Police. On October 7, 1996, I was sixty years old, living with my elderly parents while fighting breast cancer when I was attacked and robbed.
 
The Montreal Police officer "helped" me out of my home, physically - by my arm - and left me out in the street alone and destitute without as much as a coat. In front of my assailant he warned me that I must never return to the house and I could not take any of my belongings with me.
 
PARTNERS IN CRIME:
A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD

On October 7, 1996, I was attacked and robbed in my parents' Montreal home, where I had been living for two years while recovering from breast cancer. At the beginning of October my teenage niece, Dawn McSweeney, and her boyfriend Alex had moved in with us. Within a week of Dawn's arrival, I was suddenly attacked for no apparent reason and without any warning. In shock, I managed to call 911.
 
One of the two officers who responded to my distress call 'helped' me out the door without as much as a coat. In front of my assailant, the officer told me that I must never return. This police officer's unilateral decision to evict me, forbidding me to return home, gave all my most precious belongings, and my aged parents' lives and property into the hands of Dawn McSweeney.
 
This action was taken without any investigation. There was no legal procedure. No hearing. No court procedure. No trial. No judgment. No background to support such an action. No justification. The officer just decided to do it. And then - he did not file a report.
 
Widowed, unemployed and fighting cancer, the Montreal Police abandoned me in the street alone, cold, homeless and destitute. My entire life was locked up behind me, in the hands of my teenage niece, Dawn McSweeney. I pleaded with the police to file a report, to go to the house and see for themselves the proof of what I was saying. They refused again and again. For six months, the police refused repeatedly to file a report. At 60, I had to start life again - from scratch.
 
Quebec's Police Ethics Commissioner, Denis Racicot, wrote to me: "The police have large powers and vast authority .... The case is "definitively closed." (sic) Large powers - to help criminals? Vast authority - to rob widows ?
 
I appealed to Quebec Premier, Jean Charest. He wrote to say that the theft of all my jewellery and the fruit of my life's work and the personal treasures my husband left to me, is "a civil matter of an unfortunate nature." Grand larceny is a civil matter ?
 
After the robbery, Dawn's mother, Debbie McSweeney, our youngest sister, obtained power of attorney from both my parents. Every other member of the family, social services, fire protection inspectors and even police detectives, were barred from my parents' home thereafter.
 
In April, 2004, the home of our youth looked like something out of an Alfred Hitchcock movie, doors and windows overgrown with dead vines. I called for help and learned that my mother had been removed from her home. So I went to the police station to file a missing person report. The officer could not file a report - because Debbie, told him by telephone that she knew where mother was. To see your mother or get information about where or how she is, you have to file a civil suit. "But you will need a lawyer." But that would take months! Can't the police check on my mother now? Sorry.
 
The following is a matter of Public Record.
 
In June, 2007, we learned that our mother had died. She was buried on June 21, 2007 after being kept in total seclusion by Debbie and her associates from the day of the robbery. Suddenly, on June 26, I started receiving hate mail and threats to drop the robbery case were posted on my blog. I reported that to the police immediately. The next afternoon, June 27, two police officers came to my door with a court order to have me committed for a 30-day mental evaluation, accusing me of being insane and dangerous. I was released from the hospital unconditionally on June 29, 2007.
 
The Suburban weekly newspaper carried that story in two parts,on September 5, 2007 and on September 12, 2007.
 
The following is also a matter of Public Record.
 
Weeks later, I found out why a complete stranger wanted me silenced: My accuser, the mise en cause who applied for the court order, was one Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme, a person I do not know and with whom I have never spoken. 

This same Prud'homme is named as the liquidator of a will in my mother's name created when she was 92 years old, handicapped mentally and physically and had been totally under the physical control and influence of Debbie and this group for a decade. Their will was notarized and executed, but OUR MOTHER DID NOT SIGN THAT WILL. All the children were included in the wills my parents had made. Only Debbie and Dawn McSweeney and Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme benefit from the bizarre 2005 will.
 
Months later, I discovered Dawn McSweeney's own blog on the internet. The heading reads:
 
Dedicated to Partners in crime and kindred spirits.
Voyeurs and well wishers also welcome.
 
In November, 2007, Member of the Quebec National Assembly, Russell Copeman, wrote an appeal to the Conseil de la Magistrature against the judge who condemned me with his court order in less than four minutes without ever seeing me or speaking to me and without any medical evidence, but based solely on the bizarre accusations made by a man I do not know and Dawn's mother, Debbie, who had not spoken with me since 1997. The Conseil de la Magistrature of Quebec replied that the judge did nothing wrong.
 
THE CLSC APOLOGIZED
FOR THEIR PART IN THE CRIME. 

To try to discredit, intimidate and silence me so that I would stop pursuing the criminal case of the robbery that took place on October 7, 1996, the "partners in crime" obtained a court order accusing me of being insane and dangerous.
A social worker at the CLSC helped Debbie McSweeney and Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme to draft the application for that court order. There were no witnesses and there was no medical evidence. I was never contacted.  

My accusers were Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme - a complete stranger to me - and my sister, Debbie Rubin McSweeney, who has not spoken a word to me since  1997.

My mother's death was the trigger. I had to be silenced. A secret was about to be revealed, but I didn't know anything about it then. 

The judge issued the court order in four minutes without ever speaking to me or anyone other than Mr. Prud'homme and Debbie. On this basis, two policemen came to my apartment and took me away.
 
In Canada in the 21st Century.
 
APOLOGY RECEIVED FROM CLSC -  (Quebec Community Clinic)
April 1, 2008
 
Through the intervention of our Member of the Quebec National Assembly, Russell Copeman, I received a copy of the following letter today, April 1, 2008:
 
Centre de sante et de services sociaux
de l'Ouest-de-l"ile
West Island
Health and Social Services Centre
 
March 11, 2008
Mr. Russell Copeman
M.N.A. for Notre-Dame-de-Grace
6332 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 205,
Montreal, Quebec
H4B 1M7
 
Subject: Complaint from Mrs. Phyllis Carter
(File Number .........) 

Dear Mr. Copeman, 

Following our meeting, I proceeded to investigate the incident that led to Mrs. Phyllis Carter being evaluated against her will.
 
The Social Worker who assisted Mrs. Carter's sister in this endeavour followed the established procedure to submit a request for psychiatric evaluation. However, while conducting this investigation, in collaboration with the Director of Mental Health program, we realized that the option of informing the respondent (person for whom the request is made), as well as verifying this person's mental health, was not present.
 
In Mrs. Carter's case, the Social Worker took for granted the sister' statements about Mrs. Carter's behaviour. Therefore, the "Protocole requete pour evaluation psychiatrique" should be revised to include the procedure of verifying the person's mental status before sending in the request.
 
The West Island Health and Social Services Centre would like to apologize to Mrs. Carter for this experience. The supervisor of the Psychosocial intake, Mr. Claude Girouard, is willing to talk to Mrs. Carter, should she wish to do so. He can be reached at 514 -------- Ext. -----
 
Users' complaints represent an occasion for the establishment to improve the quality of its services. We thank you for bringing this situation to our attention.
 
Yours truly, 

Diane Joly
Local Service Quality and Complaints Commissioner
 
I am now 81 years old. I have been fighting for justice in this case since the day I was attacked and robbed, October 7, 1996. I will never give up. I want to make it very clear that I will not accept money or compensation" from anyone. I want my father's own legal will to be reinstated. I do not want anything from my parents' estate for myself. I want only what Dawn McSweeney and her associates stole from me. And I want the thieves tried in criminal court.
 
Who is responsible? 

Everyone in authority who has refused to recover and return our precious belongings and take legal action against the criminals who destroyed my family.
And still the Montreal Police do nothing.  

Montreal, Quebec and Canadian politicians and police are corrupt.

Who can we turn to?
 
I am fighting for that rare and elusive treasure - JUSTICE !

I will not settle for anything less.

Phyllis Carter

More than 400,000 readers from the U.S.A. to Great Britain, Germany, France, Israel, Japan, Macau, Ukraine, Russia, Saudi Arabia and China - But there is still no justice for Victims of The Montreal Police.

Note: I was told that Ed McSweeney died. I know nothing about how.

Since then, my sister, Debbie, has been at the mercy of Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme, and no one knows what happened to her or my mother or the innocent children. 

Our family was destroyed by the crimes of Dawn McSweeney and the Montreal Police.


 MARLENE JENNINGS, M.P.

Affiliations: Member of the Standing Committee on on Justice and Human Rights; Member of the Canada-Israel Inter-Parliamentary (Friendship) Group, of which she was Vice-Chair (2006-07) and Chair (2005-06); Vice-Chair (Liberal) of the All-Party Group for the Prevention of Genocide and Other Crimes against Humanity; sworn to the Québec Bar Association (1988).
 
First elected in June 1997, the Honourable Marlene Jennings was re-elected as the Member of Parliament for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce–Lachine in November 2000, in June 2004 in January 2006 and in October 2008. Mrs. Jennings is the first Black woman from Quebec to be elected to Parliament in the history of Confederation. She became a member of Privy Council in July 2004.
 
Mrs. Jennings' multi-disciplinary experience has been garnered through positions with both the public and private sectors. She has earned over nine years professional experience in the area of policing, first as a member of the Quebec Police Commission (1988-90) and then as Deputy Commissioner for Police Ethics for the Province of Quebec (1990-97). 

Read all the details of the Crimes of Dawn McSweeney and the Montreal Police at -http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com.

MESSAGE TO THE NRA – STOP MURDERING CHILDREN !


"On April 20, 2018, school children around the country in public and private schools will be signed out and walk out at 11:00 am Colorado time, and march to mayors' offices, governors' offices, the White House, local NRA offices, Mar-a-Lago, campaign offices, etc. Enough is enough. And saying "enough is enough" is getting old. Not one more student should die by gun violence."

Libby Higgins,

Facebook.

February 16, 2018 • Camarillo, CA, United States •


THERE ARE ONLY TWO ACTIONS PEOPLE CAN TAKE TO STOP THE NRA WITHOUT VIOLENCE: FILL THE STREETS WITH ENDLESS PROTESTS AND VOTE THE REPUBLICANS OUT OF POWER AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY.

Friday, February 16, 2018

SEVENTEEN MORE MURDERS BY THE NRA


TEARS AND RAGE. HOW MANY MORE CHILDREN HAVE TO DIE BEFORE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MAKE IT STOP? YES. IT IS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACCEPTING THE NRA AS THEIR GOVERNMENT.
 
TEARS AND RAGE. LOOK AT THE FACES OF THOSE BEAUTIFUL YOUNG STUDENTS AND THEIR TEACHERS. LOOK AT THE PRECIOUS LIVES WIPED OUT BY AN EVIL PERSON WITH A GUN PROVIDED BY THE NRA.
 
EVEN THE MOST INSANE LUNATIC COULD NOT SHOOT ANYONE WITHOUT A GUN.
 
DONALD TRUMP AND THE NRA WILL TRY TO DISTRACT YOU WITH RIDICULOUS EXCUSES.

AS REPORTED IN HITLER'S MEIN KAMPF, DONALD TRUMP WILL NEVER ADMIT HIS GUILT.

THE TRUTH IS SIMPLE: YOU CAN'T SHOOT ANYONE WITHOUT A GUN AND THE NRA PUTS THOSE GUNS INTO THE HANDS OF LUNATICS.
 
THE BLOOD OF THE VICTIMS IS ON DONALD TRUMP'S HANDS.


 Russian bots promote pro-gun messages after Florida school shooting.

Russia-linked bots are promoting pro-gun messages on Twitter in an attempt to sow discord in the aftermath of the Florida school shooting, ... The reason why these accounts seize on shootings like the Parkland school one is not ideological, but to amplify "extreme and divisive causes" in a bid to .

(CNN)


THESE ARE THE LATEST VICTIMS OF THE NRA

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-school-shooting-these-are-17-victims-n848706

TRUMP AND HITLER - THE BIG LIE - "FAKE NEWS".


THE BIG LIE

Hitler's use of the expression.

The source of the Big Lie technique is this passage, taken from Chapter 10 of James Murphy's translation of Hitler's Mein Kampf:
 
But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice.
 
All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true within itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

 
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X[1]

Thus, according to Hitler, the "Big Lie" was a propaganda technique typically used by "the Jews".[1]
 
Goebbels's use of the expression

 Later, Joseph Goebbels put forth a slightly different theory which has come to be more commonly associated with the expression "big lie". Goebbels wrote the following paragraph in an article dated 12 January 1941, 16 years after Hitler's first use of the phrase. The article, titled Aus Churchills Lügenfabrik (English: "From Churchill's Lie Factory") was published in Die Zeit ohne Beispiel.
 
The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.[2]
 
Holocaust.

Jeffrey Herf maintains that Goebbels and the Nazis used the Big Lie to turn long-standing anti-semitism into mass murder.[3] Herf argues that the Big Lie was a narrative of an innocent, besieged Germany striking back at an "international Jewry", which it said started World War I. The propaganda repeated over and over the conspiracy that Jews were the real powers in Britain, Russia and the U.S. It went on to state that the Jews had begun a "war of extermination" against Germany, and so Germany had a duty and a right to "exterminate" and "annihilate" the Jews in self-defense.[4]
 
Usage in Hitler's psychological profile
The phrase was also used in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile:[5][6]
 

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.[7]
 
The above quote appears in the Nizkor Project's site[8] though the source document is not cited. The quote does not appear in the report, A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler: His Life and Legend, by Walter C. Langer with collaboration by Henry Murray, Ernst Kris and Bertram Lewin,[9] which is available from the US National Archives, though it does appear, unreferenced, on page 57 in Langer's ebook by the same title (without mention of the collaborators on his previous work).[10]

A somewhat similar quote - "never to admit a fault or wrong; never to accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time; blame that enemy for everything that goes wrong; take advantage of every opportunity to raise a political whirlwind" - appears on page 219 in a different report also available from the US National Archive, namely, Analysis of the Personality of Adolph Hitler: With Predictions of His Future Behaviour and Suggestions for Dealing with Him Now and After Germany's Surrender, by Henry A. Murray, October 1943[11] though Murray's work is neither referenced in Langer's ebook nor in the Hitler's Source-Book[12] compiled by Langer and upon which his ebook heavily depends.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie

THE REPUBLICANS MUST USE THEIR CORRECT NAMES


Image result for ku klux klan photos images


AT THE NEXT ELECTIONS, THE PEOPLE MUST REQUIRE THE "GOP - REPUBLICANS " TO USE THEIR CORRECT NAMES DURING THE CAMPAIGNS AND AT THE POLLS.


Thursday, February 15, 2018

DONALD TRUMP'S AMERICA - A TRAIL OF DEATH


AMERICAN MASS SHOOTINGS.


Mass shootings in the US: there have been 1,624 in 1,870 days.

No other developed nation comes close to the rate of US gun violence. Americans own an estimated 265m guns, more than one gun for every adult.

Data from the Gun Violence Archive reveals there is a mass shooting – defined as four or more people shot in one incident, not including the shooter – nine out of every 10 days on average

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2017/oct/02/america-mass-shootings-gun-violence.

Attack on a Florida high school is the eighth shooting to have resulted in death or injury during the first seven weeks of the year.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/14/school-shootings-in-america-2018-how-many-so-far


After Sandy Hook, More Than 
400 People Have Been Shot in Over 200 School Shootings

When a gunman killed 20 first graders and six adults with an assault rifle at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, it rattled Newtown, Conn., and reverberated across the world. Since then, there have been at least 239 school shootings nationwide. In those episodes, 438 people were shot, 138 of whom were killed.
The data used here is from the Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit that began tracking school shootings in 2014, about a year after Sandy Hook.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/02/15/us/school-shootings-sandy-hook-parkland.html.

See also:

A GUN FOR EVERY CHILD. A BULLET FOR EVERY CHILD. THAT IS THE AMERICAN WAY


"There have been at least 12 school shootings in America so far in 2018.  It's February 15th" -
 



TEACH YOUR CHILDREN TO SHOOT FIRST AND SHOOT FAST.

A GUN FOR EVERY CHILD. A BULLET FOR EVERY CHILD.

THAT IS TRUMP'S AMERICA. THAT IS THE "PATRIOTIC" WAY.


MILLIONS OF AMERICANS SAY, "THAT'S OKAY."